PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHPI vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KHPI vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHPI achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.


KHPI

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
4.52%
6M
4.13%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.37%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KHPI vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KHPI and RBIL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KHPI vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHPI
KHPI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
KHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHPI vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KHPIRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

2.13

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

7.82

-5.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.96

42.95

-33.99

KHPI vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KHPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHPI and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KHPI vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHPI drawdown since its inception was -10.58%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHPI and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KHPIRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-0.52%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-0.52%

-6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.50%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-0.07%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.10%

+1.32%

Volatility

KHPI vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that KHPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KHPIRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

0.36%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.93%

0.85%

+5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.60%

0.95%

+6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.67%

1.07%

+8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.67%

1.07%

+8.60%

KHPI vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KHPI has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

KHPI vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

KHPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than RBIL's 4.38% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KHPI and RBIL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KHPI has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KHPI dropped -10.58% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, KHPI leads with 12.71% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KHPI has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for KHPI.

KHPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.94%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.

KHPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Kensington Asset Management and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for KHPI and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KHPI and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer