KGLD vs. MINT
KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. KGLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
KGLD vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGLD achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 1.81% return.
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
KGLD vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 2.99% | 29.75% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.81% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGLD and MINT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGLD vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
KGLD
MINT
KGLD vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGLD | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 5.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 2.47 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
KGLD vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGLD | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -4.62% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.40% | 0.00% | -19.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -0.17% | -5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
KGLD vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGLD | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.72% | 0.27% | +28.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 0.58% | +28.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 0.95% | +27.77% |
KGLD vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGLD vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.64%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 12.64% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGLD and MINT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 12.64%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.
KGLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.36% for MINT.
Find the right allocation for KGLD and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer