KGLD vs. IAU
KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. KGLD is actively managed, while IAU is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. KGLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
KGLD vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KGLD having a 2.99% return and IAU slightly lower at 2.98%.
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
KGLD vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 2.99% | 29.75% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 30.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGLD and IAU is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGLD vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
KGLD
IAU
KGLD vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGLD | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.62 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
KGLD vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGLD | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -45.14% | +24.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.40% | -17.70% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -15.96% | +9.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility
KGLD vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGLD | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.72% | 26.42% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 17.95% | +10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 15.90% | +12.82% |
KGLD vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGLD vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.64%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 12.64% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, KGLD and IAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 12.64%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
KGLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while IAU is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.25% for IAU.
Find the right allocation for KGLD and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer