KGC vs. LUG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO).
Performance
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 8.51% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -6.72% | 310.07% | 76.47% | 32.52% | 21.88% | -3.96% | 33.84% | 75.27% | 1.60% | -7.93% |
Different Trading Currencies
KGC is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
KGC:
$36.89B
LUG.TO:
CA$25.81B
KGC:
$1.97
LUG.TO:
CA$3.28
KGC:
15.53
LUG.TO:
32.41
KGC:
0.21
LUG.TO:
0.43
KGC:
5.27
LUG.TO:
14.40
KGC:
4.31
LUG.TO:
18.95
KGC:
$7.06B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.79B
KGC:
$3.48B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.26B
KGC:
$4.26B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -6.72% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 25.62%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 37.74% annualized return.
KGC
- 1D
- 6.71%
- 1M
- -17.39%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 143.53%
- 3Y*
- 89.08%
- 5Y*
- 36.79%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- -6.72%
- 6M
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- 160.40%
- 3Y*
- 94.92%
- 5Y*
- 60.97%
- 10Y*
- 37.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGC vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KGC
LUG.TO
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGC | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.87 | 2.65 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 2.71 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 6.26 | -1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.11 | 18.43 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGC | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.65 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 1.28 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.83 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.38 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and LUG.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than LUG.TO's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.44% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 4.69% | 3.37% | 2.69% | 3.28% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than LUG.TO's maximum drawdown of -79.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and LUG.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGC | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.00% | -95.45% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.20% | -25.33% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.44% | -38.94% | -22.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.75% | -41.84% | -25.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.73% | -16.21% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.85% | -65.23% | +7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.52% | 8.78% | -0.26% |
Volatility
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is 17.82%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 20.87%. This indicates that KGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KGC | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.82% | 20.87% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.92% | 44.75% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.25% | 60.82% | -10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.55% | 48.04% | -4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.66% | 45.61% | +2.05% |
Financials
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KGC vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 359.14M and revenue of 534.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 334.43M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.6%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 237.81M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in a net margin of 44.5%.