PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGC vs. AMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGC vs. AMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -17.75% return, which is significantly lower than AMD's 122.33% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has underperformed AMD with an annualized return of 16.68%, while AMD has yielded a comparatively higher 54.21% annualized return.


KGC

1D
-2.20%
1M
-1.58%
6M
-26.61%
YTD
-17.75%
1Y
45.18%
3Y*
71.30%
5Y*
30.97%
10Y*
16.68%
ALL TIME*
4.99%

AMD

1D
-1.90%
1M
-11.97%
6M
101.14%
YTD
122.33%
1Y
170.06%
3Y*
59.38%
5Y*
35.00%
10Y*
54.21%
ALL TIME*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.68B$14.29B$16.05B
$162.18M$178.21M$212.46M

KGC vs. AMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-17.75%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%-19.00%56.04%46.30%-25.00%38.91%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
122.33%77.30%-18.06%127.59%-54.99%56.91%99.98%148.43%79.57%-9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and AMD is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 1994

0.10

Over the past year, KGC and AMD have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KGC:

$27.58B

AMD:

$776.41B

EPS

KGC:

$2.61

AMD:

$3.04

PE Ratio

KGC:

8.84

AMD:

156.53

PEG Ratio

KGC:

0.12

AMD:

4.18

PS Ratio

KGC:

3.32

AMD:

20.93

PB Ratio

KGC:

2.86

AMD:

12.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGC:

$8.39B

AMD:

$37.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGC:

$4.50B

AMD:

$18.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

KGC:

$5.58B

AMD:

$7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGC vs. AMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

AMD
AMD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KGC vs. AMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGCAMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

6.16

-5.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

12.22

-9.74

KGC vs. AMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the AMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and AMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGC vs. AMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, roughly equal to the maximum AMD drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and AMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGCAMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-96.59%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.66%

-27.76%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.66%

-63.00%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.22%

-65.45%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

-65.45%

-2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.16%

-18.03%

-21.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.51%

-56.50%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.22%

13.97%

+4.25%

Volatility

KGC vs. AMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is 12.31%, while Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) has a volatility of 24.42%. This indicates that KGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGCAMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.31%

24.42%

-12.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.64%

56.14%

-15.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.21%

71.36%

-19.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.41%

56.94%

-12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.87%

57.00%

-10.13%

Dividends

KGC vs. AMD - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while AMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.63%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%

Financials

KGC vs. AMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KGC vs. AMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 2.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

AMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.42B and revenue of 10.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.

AMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 10.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 822.76M and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in a net margin of 37.7%.

AMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 10.25B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGC and AMD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMD has higher volatility (24.42%) compared to KGC (12.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs AMD's -96.59%.

AMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGC and AMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer