PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KFEB vs. JUNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KFEB achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than JUNZ's 8.42% return.


KFEB

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.73%
YTD
11.46%
6M
10.76%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JUNZ

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.04%
YTD
8.42%
6M
8.23%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KFEB and JUNZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025

0.81

The correlation between KFEB and JUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KFEB vs. JUNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KFEB
KFEB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
KFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

JUNZ
JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KFEBJUNZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

2.56

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.46

11.27

+4.19

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the JUNZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KFEB and JUNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KFEBJUNZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.12

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.85

+0.33

Drawdowns

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KFEB drawdown since its inception was -14.16%, smaller than the maximum JUNZ drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KFEB and JUNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KFEBJUNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-17.88%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-8.27%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.40%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-4.27%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.88%

-0.29%

Volatility

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) have volatilities of 2.41% and 2.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KFEBJUNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.45%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

7.85%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

10.01%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

11.74%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

11.73%

+1.54%

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KFEB and JUNZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

KFEB vs. JUNZ - Dividend Comparison

KFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
2.12%2.30%3.97%6.03%0.56%0.32%
KFEB
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KFEB and JUNZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JUNZ has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to KFEB (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KFEB dropped -14.16% vs JUNZ's -17.88%.

On 1-year performance, KFEB leads with 24.53% vs 21.10% for JUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KFEB has performed better with a 24.53% return vs 21.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KFEB and JUNZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JUNZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for KFEB.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and TrueShares.

KFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KFEB and JUNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer