PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEQU vs. TKO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEQU vs. TKO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) and TKO Group Holdings Inc. (TKO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEQU achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than TKO's -1.71% return.


KEQU

1D
3.32%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
-6.09%
6M
-7.58%
1Y
-13.22%
3Y*
30.74%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
7.32%

TKO

1D
0.14%
1M
8.77%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
-5.76%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEQU vs. TKO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KEQU
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
-6.09%-39.53%112.83%61.68%
TKO
TKO Group Holdings Inc.
-1.71%48.92%74.20%-16.96%

Correlation

The correlation between KEQU and TKO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEQU:

$104.79M

TKO:

$39.67B

EPS

KEQU:

$3.73

TKO:

$1.96

PE Ratio

KEQU:

9.43

TKO:

104.17

PEG Ratio

KEQU:

0.03

TKO:

0.22

PS Ratio

KEQU:

0.36

TKO:

7.92

PB Ratio

KEQU:

1.48

TKO:

11.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEQU:

$287.75M

TKO:

$5.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEQU:

$83.23M

TKO:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

KEQU:

$26.69M

TKO:

$1.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEQU vs. TKO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEQU
KEQU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
KEQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEQU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KEQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEQU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TKO
TKO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TKO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TKO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TKO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TKO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TKO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEQU vs. TKO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) and TKO Group Holdings Inc. (TKO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KEQUTKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.13

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

1.01

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

2.04

-2.46

KEQU vs. TKO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEQU Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the TKO Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEQU and TKO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEQU vs. TKO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEQU drawdown since its inception was -79.95%, which is greater than TKO's maximum drawdown of -28.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEQU and TKO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEQUTKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.95%

-28.35%

-51.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.35%

-18.28%

-25.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.58%

-8.69%

-40.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.26%

-8.74%

-23.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.09%

9.02%

+22.07%

Volatility

KEQU vs. TKO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) is 10.45%, while TKO Group Holdings Inc. (TKO) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that KEQU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TKO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEQUTKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.45%

11.46%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.73%

23.55%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.13%

31.97%

+23.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.30%

33.04%

+17.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.03%

33.04%

+13.99%

Dividends

KEQU vs. TKO - Dividend Comparison

KEQU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TKO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEQU
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.24%2.17%2.21%2.29%2.81%
TKO
TKO Group Holdings Inc.
1.53%1.10%0.00%4.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KEQU vs. TKO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and TKO Group Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
69.40M
1.60B
(KEQU) Total Revenue
(TKO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KEQU vs. TKO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and TKO Group Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.7%
0
Portfolio components
KEQU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a gross profit of 18.55M and revenue of 69.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.

TKO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TKO Group Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KEQU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported an operating income of 2.58M and revenue of 69.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

TKO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TKO Group Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 338.50M and revenue of 1.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

KEQU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation reported a net income of 692.00K and revenue of 69.40M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

TKO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TKO Group Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 248.20M and revenue of 1.60B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KEQU and TKO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TKO has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to KEQU (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEQU dropped -79.95% vs TKO's -28.35%.

TKO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEQU and TKO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer