PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEP vs. REVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEP vs. REVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and REV Group, Inc. (REVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEP achieves a -22.67% return, which is significantly lower than REVG's 5.08% return.


KEP

1D
4.33%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
-22.67%
6M
-21.03%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
-5.73%

REVG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.08%
6M
9.45%
1Y
42.35%
3Y*
89.79%
5Y*
32.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEP vs. REVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KEP
Korea Electric Power Corporation
-22.67%147.56%-4.05%-16.09%-5.47%-25.51%3.72%-19.80%-16.71%-3.54%
REVG
REV Group, Inc.
5.08%91.79%108.93%46.01%-9.35%62.15%-26.83%65.71%-76.63%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between KEP and REVG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2017

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEP:

$16.55B

REVG:

$3.15B

EPS

KEP:

₩6.83K

REVG:

$1.93

PE Ratio

KEP:

2.84

REVG:

33.05

PEG Ratio

KEP:

0.06

REVG:

0.22

PS Ratio

KEP:

0.26

REVG:

1.28

PB Ratio

KEP:

0.51

REVG:

7.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEP:

₩97.47T

REVG:

$2.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEP:

₩16.07T

REVG:

$369.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

KEP:

₩29.23T

REVG:

$168.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEP vs. REVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEP
KEP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
KEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
KEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

REVG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEP vs. REVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and REV Group, Inc. (REVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KEPREVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.20

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

6.08

-4.98

KEP vs. REVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the REVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEP and REVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEP vs. REVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEP drawdown since its inception was -78.55%, smaller than the maximum REVG drawdown of -88.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEP and REVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEPREVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.55%

-88.07%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.84%

-23.48%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.84%

-23.48%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.34%

-43.74%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.75%

-7.32%

-43.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.51%

-40.90%

-3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.99%

8.34%

+12.65%

Volatility

KEP vs. REVG - Volatility Comparison

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to REV Group, Inc. (REVG) at 0.00%. This indicates that KEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEPREVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

0.00%

+11.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.85%

13.38%

+24.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.54%

29.72%

+23.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.10%

43.95%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.40%

51.58%

-16.18%

Dividends

KEP vs. REVG - Dividend Comparison

KEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while REVG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEP
Korea Electric Power Corporation
4.09%3.16%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.68%6.46%
REVG
REV Group, Inc.
0.28%0.39%10.07%1.10%1.58%1.06%1.14%1.64%2.66%0.46%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KEP vs. REVG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Korea Electric Power Corporation and REV Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00T10.00T15.00T20.00T25.00T20222023202420252026
25.13T
664.40M
(KEP) Total Revenue
(REVG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KEP values in KRW, REVG values in USD

KEP vs. REVG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Korea Electric Power Corporation and REV Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
18.6%
15.4%
Portfolio components
KEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.68T and revenue of 25.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.

REVG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.60M and revenue of 664.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

KEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported an operating income of 3.93T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

REVG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.60M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

KEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a net income of 2.59T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

REVG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a net income of 28.90M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KEP and REVG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEP has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to REVG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEP dropped -78.55% vs REVG's -88.07%.

REVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEP and REVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer