PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEP vs. EVRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEP vs. EVRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEP achieves a -24.91% return, which is significantly lower than EVRG's 20.23% return.


KEP

1D
3.68%
1M
-2.90%
6M
-28.67%
YTD
-24.91%
1Y
-5.40%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
-6.34%

EVRG

1D
0.50%
1M
2.22%
6M
19.69%
YTD
20.23%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEP vs. EVRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KEP
Korea Electric Power Corporation
-24.91%147.56%-4.05%-16.09%-5.47%-25.51%3.72%-19.80%-2.77%
EVRG
Evergy, Inc.
20.23%22.44%23.41%-13.28%-4.89%27.99%-11.67%18.38%4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KEP and EVRG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018

0.18

The correlation between KEP and EVRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEP:

$15.91B

EVRG:

$19.76B

EPS

KEP:

₩6.82K

EVRG:

$3.76

PE Ratio

KEP:

2.74

EVRG:

22.78

PS Ratio

KEP:

0.25

EVRG:

3.35

PB Ratio

KEP:

0.49

EVRG:

1.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEP:

₩97.47T

EVRG:

$5.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEP:

₩16.07T

EVRG:

$2.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

KEP:

₩29.23T

EVRG:

$2.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEP vs. EVRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEP
KEP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
KEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
KEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEP Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EVRG
EVRG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EVRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVRG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EVRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVRG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEP vs. EVRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KEPEVRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.29

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

3.84

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

9.86

-10.11

KEP vs. EVRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEP Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the EVRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEP and EVRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEP vs. EVRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEP drawdown since its inception was -78.55%, which is greater than EVRG's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEP and EVRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEPEVRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.55%

-38.79%

-39.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.84%

-7.30%

-41.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.84%

-21.10%

-27.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.84%

-29.84%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.17%

-2.75%

-49.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-9.83%

-34.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.28%

2.84%

+21.44%

Volatility

KEP vs. EVRG - Volatility Comparison

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) at 5.09%. This indicates that KEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEPEVRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.50%

5.09%

+9.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.94%

12.61%

+26.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.53%

15.96%

+32.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.42%

18.92%

+19.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.58%

24.28%

+11.30%

Dividends

KEP vs. EVRG - Dividend Comparison

KEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than EVRG's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVRG
Evergy, Inc.
3.21%3.72%4.22%4.75%3.70%3.17%3.69%2.97%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KEP
Korea Electric Power Corporation
4.21%3.16%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.68%6.46%

Financials

KEP vs. EVRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Korea Electric Power Corporation and Evergy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00T10.00T15.00T20.00T25.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
25.13T
1.44B
(KEP) Total Revenue
(EVRG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KEP values in KRW, EVRG values in USD

KEP vs. EVRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Korea Electric Power Corporation and Evergy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.6%
67.5%
Portfolio components
KEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.68T and revenue of 25.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.

EVRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Evergy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 974.10M and revenue of 1.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.5%.

KEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported an operating income of 3.93T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

EVRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Evergy, Inc. reported an operating income of 318.40M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.

KEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a net income of 2.59T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

EVRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Evergy, Inc. reported a net income of 151.50M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KEP and EVRG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEP has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to EVRG (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEP dropped -78.55% vs EVRG's -38.79%.

EVRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEP and EVRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer