KEMX vs. USOY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. KEMX is passively managed, while USOY is actively managed. Over the past year, KEMX returned 82.49% vs 55.52% for USOY. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.

Performance

KEMX vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 44.15% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 59.86% return.

KEMX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 14.75%
• YTD: 44.15%
• 6M: 50.30%
• 1Y: 82.49%
• 3Y*: 30.23%
• 5Y*: 14.09%
• 10Y*: —

USOY

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 59.86%
• 6M: 58.33%
• 1Y: 55.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	44.15%	38.28%	-1.43%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	59.86%	-7.93%	7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and USOY is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024	-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between KEMX and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

KEMX vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 92
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

USOY

USOY Risk / Return Rank: 56
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEMX	USOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.71	1.83	+1.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.43	2.25	+2.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.34	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	4.10	+1.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.72	7.91	+13.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEMX vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMX and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEMX	USOY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71	1.83	+1.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.96	-0.27

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and USOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMX	USOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.80%	-17.46%	-21.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.36%	-14.29%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.47%	+6.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.86%	-6.47%	-2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	7.42%	-3.57%

Volatility

KEMX vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) is 9.67%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that KEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMX	USOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.67%	11.94%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.84%	27.16%	-7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.34%	30.46%	-8.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.20%	26.14%	-7.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.94%	26.14%	-5.20%

KEMX vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEMX vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than USOY's 54.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.28%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	54.95%	104.32%	48.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEMX and USOY in my portfolio?

KEMX and USOY have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEMX or USOY?

USOY has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to KEMX (9.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs USOY's -17.46%.

Which ETF is better, KEMX or USOY?

On 1-year performance, KEMX leads with 82.49% vs 55.52% for USOY. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KEMX has been the lower-risk option at 9.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEMX or USOY?

Over the 1-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 82.49% return vs 55.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEMX or USOY?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEMX or USOY?

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.95%, compared with 2.28% for KEMX.

What is the main difference between KEMX and USOY?

KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 1.22% for USOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.