KEMX vs. EDGI
KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and EDGI (3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while EDGI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management. KEMX is passively managed, while EDGI is actively managed. Over the past year, KEMX returned 56.00% vs 22.76% for EDGI. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for EDGI.
Performance
KEMX vs. EDGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 30.22% return, which is significantly higher than EDGI's 9.43% return.
KEMX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- 6M
- 16.35%
- YTD
- 30.22%
- 1Y
- 56.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.50%
EDGI
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $817.52K | $2.19M | $1.06M | |
| $527.87K | $528.96K | $586.53K |
KEMX vs. EDGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 30.22% | 38.28% | -7.88% |
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF | 9.43% | 26.77% | -7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMX and EDGI is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between KEMX and EDGI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
KEMX vs. EDGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KEMX
EDGI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
KEMX
EDGI
Financial Services
KEMX
EDGI
Industrials
KEMX
EDGI
Basic Materials
KEMX
EDGI
Consumer Cyclical
KEMX
EDGI
Energy
KEMX
EDGI
Communication Services
KEMX
EDGI
Consumer Defensive
KEMX
EDGI
Utilities
KEMX
EDGI
Healthcare
KEMX
EDGI
Real Estate
KEMX
EDGI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMX vs. EDGI — Risk / Return Rank
KEMX
EDGI
KEMX vs. EDGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEMX | EDGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 1.78 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | 6.11 | +4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEMX vs. EDGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than EDGI's maximum drawdown of -14.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and EDGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMX | EDGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -14.52% | -24.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.11% | -12.84% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -2.06% | -9.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -2.88% | -5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 3.74% | +1.38% |
Volatility
KEMX vs. EDGI - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) at 5.88%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMX | EDGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 5.88% | +3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.90% | 14.81% | +10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.99% | 16.74% | +10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 16.59% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 16.59% | +4.92% |
KEMX vs. EDGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGI's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEMX vs. EDGI - Dividend Comparison
KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than EDGI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.97% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMX and EDGI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to EDGI (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs EDGI's -14.52%.
On 1-year performance, KEMX leads with 56.00% vs 22.76% for EDGI. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EDGI has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 56.00% return vs 22.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for EDGI.
KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.38% for EDGI.
KEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EDGI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: CICC and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.97% for EDGI.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEMX and EDGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer