KEAT vs. YCS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KEAT (Keating Active ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). KEAT is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, KEAT returned 25.42% vs 25.05% for YCS. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. KEAT charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

KEAT vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEAT achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.29% return.

KEAT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.95%
• 6M: 3.71%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 1Y: 25.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.29%

YCS

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.27%
• 6M: 9.33%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 1Y: 25.05%
• 3Y*: 17.34%
• 5Y*: 23.55%
• 10Y*: 13.76%
• ALL TIME*: 6.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KEAT Keating Active ETF	$40.28K	$122.03K	$129.65K
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	$1.53M	$2.43M	$1.42M

KEAT vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KEAT Keating Active ETF	10.28%	22.76%	3.10%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	7.29%	9.04%	13.78%

Correlation

The correlation between KEAT and YCS is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	-0.21

Return for Risk

KEAT vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 79
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 56
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KEAT vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KEAT	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.16	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	1.52	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.23	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	2.35	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	8.93	-2.25

KEAT vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEAT and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KEAT vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEAT drawdown since its inception was -10.59%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEAT and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEAT	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.59%	-49.56%	+38.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.59%	-8.30%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-5.68%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-19.75%	+17.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	2.64%	+1.19%

Volatility

KEAT vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is 2.45%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that KEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEAT	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	5.30%	-2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	11.65%	-2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.87%	16.85%	-5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.37%	21.16%	-10.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.37%	18.61%	-8.24%

KEAT vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEAT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEAT vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

KEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.51%	2.48%	1.72%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEAT and YCS in my portfolio?

KEAT and YCS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEAT or YCS?

YCS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to KEAT (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEAT dropped -10.59% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, KEAT or YCS?

On 1-year performance, KEAT leads with 25.42% vs 25.05% for YCS. On fees, KEAT is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, KEAT has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEAT or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, KEAT has performed better with a 25.42% return vs 25.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEAT or YCS?

KEAT is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEAT or YCS?

KEAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between KEAT and YCS?

KEAT is categorized as Global Allocation, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Keating and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for KEAT and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.