PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEAT vs. TFPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KEAT vs. TFPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KEAT vs. TFPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
11.91%22.76%2.41%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
10.08%3.61%-2.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEAT achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than TFPN's 10.08% return.


KEAT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
11.91%
6M
15.74%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFPN

1D
1.68%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
10.08%
6M
13.62%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KEAT vs. TFPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEAT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TFPN's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KEAT vs. TFPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEAT
KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TFPN
TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEAT vs. TFPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEATTFPNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

1.87

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

2.58

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.34

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

3.46

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.77

10.31

+6.46

KEAT vs. TFPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the TFPN Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEAT and TFPN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEATTFPNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.87

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.43

+1.36

Correlation

The correlation between KEAT and TFPN is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KEAT vs. TFPN - Dividend Comparison

KEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
2.37%2.48%1.72%0.00%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.98%

Drawdowns

KEAT vs. TFPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEAT drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum TFPN drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEAT and TFPN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KEATTFPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-16.72%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-7.47%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-4.63%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-5.13%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

2.50%

-0.73%

Volatility

KEAT vs. TFPN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is 2.97%, while Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that KEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KEATTFPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

5.44%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

11.31%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

13.47%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.39%

12.42%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

12.42%

-2.03%