KEAT vs. ELM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KEAT (Keating Active ETF) and ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating, while ELM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Elm. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KEAT returned 19.10% vs 17.21% for ELM. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KEAT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ELM.

Performance

KEAT vs. ELM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEAT achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than ELM's 6.28% return.

KEAT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 4.22%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ELM

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 6.39%
• 1Y: 17.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEAT vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KEAT Keating Active ETF	5.02%	19.08%
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	6.28%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between KEAT and ELM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

KEAT vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 51
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

ELM

ELM Risk / Return Rank: 56
ELM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ELM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ELM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ELM Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ELM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEAT vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KEAT	ELM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.77	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.47	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	2.30	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.99	9.37	-2.38

KEAT vs. ELM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the ELM Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEAT and ELM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KEAT vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEAT drawdown since its inception was -9.40%, roughly equal to the maximum ELM drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEAT and ELM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEAT	ELM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-9.02%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-7.52%	-1.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.40%	-1.76%	-7.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-1.32%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	1.84%	+0.90%

Volatility

KEAT vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison

Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEAT	ELM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.63%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	8.11%	+0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.73%	9.79%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.41%	10.46%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.41%	10.46%	-0.05%

KEAT vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEAT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEAT vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison

KEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than ELM's 2.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	2.55%	2.71%	0.00%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.34%	2.48%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEAT and ELM in my portfolio?

KEAT and ELM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEAT or ELM?

ELM has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to KEAT (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEAT dropped -9.40% vs ELM's -9.02%.

Which ETF is better, KEAT or ELM?

On 1-year performance, KEAT leads with 19.10% vs 17.21% for ELM. On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, KEAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEAT or ELM?

Over the 1-year period, KEAT has performed better with a 19.10% return vs 17.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEAT or ELM?

ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEAT or ELM?

ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.34% for KEAT.

What is the main difference between KEAT and ELM?

KEAT is categorized as Global Allocation, while ELM is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Keating and Elm. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for KEAT and 0.24% for ELM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.