KDEF vs. VTI
KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the The Korea Defence Industry Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KDEF returned 23.84% vs 26.27% for VTI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
KDEF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KDEF having a 10.00% return and VTI slightly lower at 9.62%.
KDEF
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 6M
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
KDEF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 10.00% | 116.28% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 13.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDEF and VTI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025 | 0.35 |
KDEF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KDEF
VTI
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
KDEF
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
KDEF
VTI
Technology
KDEF
VTI
Healthcare
KDEF
VTI
Basic Materials
KDEF
-
VTI
Communication Services
KDEF
-
VTI
Consumer Defensive
KDEF
-
VTI
Energy
KDEF
-
VTI
Financial Services
KDEF
-
VTI
Real Estate
KDEF
-
VTI
Utilities
KDEF
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDEF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
KDEF
VTI
KDEF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KDEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 2.79 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 12.52 | -10.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KDEF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.55% | -55.45% | +19.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.55% | -8.92% | -26.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.83% | -2.14% | -24.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -8.02% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.09% | 1.99% | +9.10% |
Volatility
KDEF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 18.52% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.50%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDEF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.52% | 4.50% | +14.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.55% | 9.82% | +28.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.43% | 12.64% | +33.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.55% | 17.47% | +30.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.55% | 18.33% | +29.22% |
KDEF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDEF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.25% | 5.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDEF and VTI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KDEF has higher volatility (18.52%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -35.55% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 1-year performance, VTI leads with 26.27% vs 23.84% for KDEF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTI has performed better with a 26.27% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.
KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.
KDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KDEF and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer