KDEC vs. POCT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KDEC (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. KDEC is actively managed, while POCT is passively managed. Over the past year, KDEC returned 18.29% vs 13.26% for POCT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

KDEC vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEC achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 4.83% return.

KDEC

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 8.90%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POCT

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 13.26%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEC vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KDEC Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December	10.13%	6.52%	-4.04%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	4.83%	11.00%	-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between KDEC and POCT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024	0.77

The correlation between KDEC and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KDEC vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEC

KDEC Risk / Return Rank: 67
KDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
KDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
KDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 62
KDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
KDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 74
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEC vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KDEC	POCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.16	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.08	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.43	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	3.03	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.25	15.34	-4.09

KDEC vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEC and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KDEC vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEC drawdown since its inception was -16.52%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEC and POCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KDEC	POCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.52%	-18.80%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-4.40%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.90%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-1.49%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	0.87%	+0.76%

Volatility

KDEC vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 1.80%. This indicates that KDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KDEC	POCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.26%	1.80%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.73%	4.96%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.56%	6.19%	+3.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.28%	7.97%	+4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.28%	10.21%	+2.07%

KDEC vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KDEC and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

KDEC vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KDEC nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KDEC Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KDEC and POCT in my portfolio?

KDEC and POCT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KDEC or POCT?

KDEC has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to POCT (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEC dropped -16.52% vs POCT's -18.80%.

Which ETF is better, KDEC or POCT?

On 1-year performance, KDEC leads with 18.29% vs 13.26% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KDEC or POCT?

Over the 1-year period, KDEC has performed better with a 18.29% return vs 13.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KDEC or POCT?

KDEC and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KDEC or POCT?

KDEC and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.