PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KDEC vs. MSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KDEC vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEC achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -53.51% return.


KDEC

1D
0.19%
1M
2.05%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.09%
1Y
19.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSDD

1D
18.16%
1M
51.29%
YTD
-53.51%
6M
-38.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEC vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KDEC and MSDD is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KDEC vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEC
KDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEC vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KDECMSDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.87

KDEC vs. MSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KDECMSDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.53

+0.09

Drawdowns

KDEC vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEC drawdown since its inception was -16.52%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEC and MSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KDECMSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.52%

-84.91%

+68.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-71.56%

+71.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-29.27%

+26.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

Volatility

KDEC vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KDECMSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

141.24%

-131.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

141.24%

-128.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.40%

141.24%

-128.84%

KDEC vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KDEC vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison

Neither KDEC nor MSDD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KDEC and MSDD have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KDEC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KDEC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

KDEC and MSDD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

KDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KDEC and 1.50% for MSDD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KDEC and MSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer