PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCTAX vs. NMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCTAX vs. NMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS California Tax (KCTAX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCTAX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than NMI's 8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, KCTAX has underperformed NMI with an annualized return of 1.51%, while NMI has yielded a comparatively higher 2.05% annualized return.


KCTAX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.99%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.38%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
1.51%

NMI

1D
-4.54%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
8.28%
6M
8.01%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCTAX vs. NMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCTAX
DWS California Tax
1.92%3.45%1.92%5.44%-12.10%1.93%3.78%8.99%0.22%5.16%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
8.28%10.52%7.03%1.90%-15.09%3.86%4.70%16.02%-8.07%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between KCTAX and NMI is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1988

0.14

The correlation between KCTAX and NMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCTAX vs. NMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCTAX
KCTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
KCTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
KCTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

NMI
NMI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMI Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCTAX vs. NMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS California Tax (KCTAX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KCTAXNMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.18

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.05

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

2.46

+5.39

KCTAX vs. NMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the NMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCTAX and NMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KCTAX vs. NMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCTAX drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, smaller than the maximum NMI drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCTAX and NMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCTAXNMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.87%

-28.92%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-10.96%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.50%

-14.54%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-28.92%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.87%

-28.92%

+11.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-5.75%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-5.92%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

4.67%

-3.73%

Volatility

KCTAX vs. NMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS California Tax (KCTAX) is 0.81%, while Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that KCTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCTAXNMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

6.54%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

14.35%

-11.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

16.70%

-13.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

14.66%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

15.01%

-10.74%

KCTAX vs. NMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCTAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than NMI's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCTAX vs. NMI - Dividend Comparison

KCTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than NMI's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCTAX
DWS California Tax
3.04%3.48%2.82%2.22%1.91%3.13%3.95%5.11%3.04%3.01%3.46%3.69%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
4.33%4.59%4.63%4.04%3.51%3.22%3.53%4.15%5.12%4.21%4.45%4.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCTAX and NMI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMI has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to KCTAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCTAX dropped -17.87% vs NMI's -28.92%.

KCTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCTAX and NMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer