KCSH vs. MAAY
KCSH (KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF) and MAAY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index, while MAAY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. KCSH is passively managed, while MAAY is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. KCSH charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for MAAY.
Performance
KCSH vs. MAAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCSH achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than MAAY's -15.55% return.
KCSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAAY
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- -15.55%
- 6M
- -31.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCSH vs. MAAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF | 1.49% | 0.67% |
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | -15.55% | -27.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCSH and MAAY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCSH vs. MAAY — Risk / Return Rank
KCSH
MAAY
KCSH vs. MAAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KCSH | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KCSH | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.26 | -1.93 | +5.20 |
Drawdowns
KCSH vs. MAAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCSH drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum MAAY drawdown of -45.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCSH and MAAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCSH | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -45.22% | +44.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -39.90% | +39.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -31.44% | +31.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | — | — |
Volatility
KCSH vs. MAAY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCSH | MAAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 30.16% | -28.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 30.16% | -28.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 30.16% | -28.83% |
KCSH vs. MAAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCSH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MAAY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCSH vs. MAAY - Dividend Comparison
KCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than MAAY's 131.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF | 3.97% | 4.35% | 2.08% |
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | 131.86% | 31.22% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCSH and MAAY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KCSH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KCSH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MAAY.
MAAY has the higher dividend yield at 131.86%, compared with 3.97% for KCSH.
KCSH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while MAAY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KCSH and 1.07% for MAAY.
Find the right allocation for KCSH and MAAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer