PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCSH vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCSH vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCSH achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 18.46% return.


KCSH

1D
0.12%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.70%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMDY

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.24%
6M
13.95%
YTD
18.46%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCSH vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KCSH and CMDY is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024

-0.05

The correlation between KCSH and CMDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCSH vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCSH
KCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
KCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCSH vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KCSHCMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

1.29

+0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.78

1.87

+4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.99

6.38

+50.61

KCSH vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCSH Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCSH and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KCSH vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCSH drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCSH and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCSHCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-31.19%

+30.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.58%

-14.23%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.31%

+9.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-13.10%

+13.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

4.15%

-4.08%

Volatility

KCSH vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) is 0.21%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that KCSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCSHCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

4.48%

-4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.44%

14.41%

-13.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25%

16.52%

-15.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.30%

15.81%

-14.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.30%

14.65%

-13.35%

KCSH vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCSH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCSH vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

KCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than CMDY's 10.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.88%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
KCSH
KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF
3.94%4.35%2.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCSH and CMDY have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMDY has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to KCSH (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCSH dropped -0.58% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

On 1-year performance, CMDY leads with 26.42% vs 3.93% for KCSH. On fees, KCSH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CMDY has performed better with a 26.42% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KCSH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.88%, compared with 3.94% for KCSH.

KCSH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CMDY is Commodities. KCSH tracks Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index, while CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KCSH and 0.28% for CMDY.

KCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCSH and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer