KCOP vs. SCOP
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and SCOP (Sprott Physical Copper Trust) are both Copper funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for SCOP.
Performance
KCOP vs. SCOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCOP
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCOP vs. SCOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 1.26% |
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | -1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and SCOP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. SCOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. SCOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than SCOP's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and SCOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | SCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -11.09% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.61% | -9.87% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -6.04% | -2.38% |
Volatility
KCOP vs. SCOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | SCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.23% | 41.07% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 41.07% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 41.07% | +3.16% |
KCOP vs. SCOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SCOP's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. SCOP - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, while SCOP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 5.29% |
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and SCOP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KCOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KCOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 0.00% for SCOP.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 1.30% for SCOP.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and SCOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer