KCOP vs. PBTP
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCOP is a Copper fund actively managed by Kurv, while PBTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). KCOP is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
KCOP vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
KCOP vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | -4.46% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and PBTP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PBTP
KCOP vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCOP | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -5.44% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.61% | -0.76% | -11.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -0.75% | -7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.21% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.23% | 1.62% | +42.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 2.85% | +41.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 2.64% | +41.59% |
KCOP vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than PBTP's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 5.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 4.82% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and PBTP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 4.82% for PBTP.
KCOP is categorized as Copper, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.07% for PBTP.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer