KCOP vs. DRLL
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCOP is a Copper fund actively managed by Kurv, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. KCOP is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Their -0.30 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
KCOP vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 9.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DRLL
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- YTD
- 29.95%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $478.10K | $507.89K | $528.94K | |
| $323.94K | $335.89K | $555.57K |
KCOP vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 4.55% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and DRLL is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRLL
KCOP vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCOP | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -23.73% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -9.02% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -8.14% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.71% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.38% | 23.14% | +19.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 23.82% | +18.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 23.82% | +18.56% |
KCOP vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than DRLL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.34% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 6.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and DRLL have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.12%, compared with 2.34% for DRLL.
KCOP is categorized as Copper, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.41% for DRLL.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer