KCEIX vs. JAKVX
KCEIX (Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund) and JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, KCEIX returned 16.72% vs 23.14% for JAKVX. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KCEIX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for JAKVX.
Performance
KCEIX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCEIX achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 12.74% return.
KCEIX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.32%
JAKVX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 23.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
KCEIX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KCEIX Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund | 11.56% | 7.09% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 12.74% | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCEIX and JAKVX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCEIX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank
KCEIX
JAKVX
KCEIX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund (KCEIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCEIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.54 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.27 | 4.27 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.56 | 12.85 | +6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCEIX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCEIX drawdown since its inception was -16.07%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCEIX and JAKVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCEIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.07% | -5.16% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -5.16% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -1.14% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -0.99% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 1.71% | -0.81% |
Volatility
KCEIX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison
Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund (KCEIX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) at 1.85%. This indicates that KCEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCEIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 1.85% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.42% | 6.37% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.62% | 7.92% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.90% | 7.48% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 7.48% | +0.61% |
KCEIX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCEIX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCEIX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison
KCEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than JAKVX's 7.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.52% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KCEIX Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund | 1.48% | 1.66% | 2.35% | 2.20% | 7.60% | 0.00% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCEIX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KCEIX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to JAKVX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCEIX dropped -16.07% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCEIX and JAKVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer