PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCE vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCE vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, KCE has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 16.37%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.


KCE

1D
-1.85%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
1.30%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
16.37%

XLV

1D
0.79%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCE vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
-1.07%10.76%37.51%32.04%-22.14%40.05%30.82%27.13%-15.63%32.01%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.29%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and XLV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between KCE and XLV has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KCE vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KCE
XLV

Financial Services

98.5%

-

Technology

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KCE
98.5%
XLV

-

Technology

KCE
1.5%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

KCE

-

XLV

-

Communication Services

KCE

-

XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

KCE

-

XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

KCE

-

XLV

-

Energy

KCE

-

XLV

-

Healthcare

KCE

-

XLV
100.0%

Industrials

KCE

-

XLV

-

Real Estate

KCE

-

XLV

-

Utilities

KCE

-

XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCE vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCE
KCE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCE vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCEXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.16

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.24

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

2.99

-1.33

KCE vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCEXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.88

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.38

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.56

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.46

-0.20

Drawdowns

KCE vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCEXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.00%

-39.17%

-34.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-10.47%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-17.11%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

-17.11%

-17.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-28.40%

-12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-7.52%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.81%

-7.12%

-15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

4.32%

+2.31%

Volatility

KCE vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCEXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.10%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

10.24%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

14.67%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

14.69%

+8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

16.55%

+6.55%

KCE vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCE vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than XLV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
1.75%1.63%1.56%1.82%2.42%1.53%2.20%2.32%2.67%1.95%2.30%2.43%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.70%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCE and XLV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KCE has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to XLV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 10-year performance, KCE leads with 16.37% vs 9.20% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KCE has performed better with a 16.37% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KCE.

KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.70% for XLV.

KCE is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.08% for XLV.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCE and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer