KCE vs. QTUM
KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KCE returned 12.87%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for QTUM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KCE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
KCE vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.
KCE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.65%
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
KCE vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 3.66% | 10.76% | 37.51% | 32.04% | -22.14% | 40.05% | 30.82% | 27.13% | -17.49% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCE and QTUM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between KCE and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KCE vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KCE
QTUM
Financial Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KCE
QTUM
-
Technology
KCE
QTUM
Basic Materials
KCE
-
QTUM
-
Communication Services
KCE
-
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
KCE
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
KCE
-
QTUM
-
Energy
KCE
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
KCE
-
QTUM
Industrials
KCE
-
QTUM
Real Estate
KCE
-
QTUM
-
Utilities
KCE
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCE vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
KCE
QTUM
KCE vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCE | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.46 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 5.46 | -4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 19.77 | -17.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCE vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCE | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.00% | -38.45% | -35.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -15.26% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.31% | -25.39% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.45% | -38.45% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -4.42% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -8.24% | -14.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 4.21% | +2.49% |
Volatility
KCE vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) is 6.04%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that KCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCE | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 14.18% | -8.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 23.17% | -7.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 28.39% | -8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 26.99% | -3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 27.40% | -4.30% |
KCE vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCE vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than QTUM's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.67% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCE and QTUM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to KCE (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 12.87% for KCE. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KCE has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.73% for QTUM.
KCE is categorized as Financials Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCE and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer