KCE vs. MAGS
KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. KCE is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KCE returned 24.58%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
KCE vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -1.59% return.
KCE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.65%
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCE vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 3.66% | 10.76% | 37.51% | 27.81% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCE and MAGS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.46 |
KCE vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KCE
MAGS
Financial Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KCE
MAGS
-
Technology
KCE
MAGS
Basic Materials
KCE
-
MAGS
-
Communication Services
KCE
-
MAGS
Consumer Cyclical
KCE
-
MAGS
Consumer Defensive
KCE
-
MAGS
-
Energy
KCE
-
MAGS
-
Healthcare
KCE
-
MAGS
-
Industrials
KCE
-
MAGS
-
Real Estate
KCE
-
MAGS
-
Utilities
KCE
-
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCE vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
KCE
MAGS
KCE vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCE | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.20 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.25 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 4.21 | -2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCE vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCE | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.00% | -29.91% | -44.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -18.62% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.31% | -29.91% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -8.50% | +4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -4.72% | -18.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 5.50% | +1.20% |
Volatility
KCE vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) have volatilities of 6.04% and 5.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCE | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.86% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 15.07% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 20.30% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 25.97% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 25.97% | -2.87% |
KCE vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCE vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than MAGS's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.67% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCE and MAGS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KCE has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.29% vs 24.58% for KCE. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 24.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KCE.
KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.50% for MAGS.
KCE is categorized as Financials Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.29% for MAGS.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCE and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer