KCE vs. GABF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KCE is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KCE returned 24.32%/yr vs 19.89%/yr for GABF. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KCE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

KCE vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's 0.15% return.

KCE

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 6.88%
• 6M: 6.20%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 24.32%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 17.63%
• ALL TIME*: 7.76%

GABF

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 1Y: 0.48%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	$107.51K	$101.42K	$192.29K
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	$2.49M	$2.29M	$2.43M

KCE vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	10.39%	10.76%	37.51%	32.04%	5.94%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	0.15%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and GABF is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.90

The correlation between KCE and GABF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

KCE vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KCE	GABF
Financial Services	97.2%	85.6%
Technology	2.8%	5.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	4.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KCE vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KCE

KCE Risk / Return Rank: 24
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 12
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KCE vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KCE	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	0.03	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	0.16	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.02	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	0.03	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	0.06	+1.64

KCE vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KCE vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCE	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.00%	-20.86%	-53.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.44%	-17.16%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.31%	-20.86%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.77%	+4.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.65%	-4.97%	-17.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.84%	7.90%	-1.06%

Volatility

KCE vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.88%. This indicates that KCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCE	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.71%	4.88%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.07%	13.34%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.73%	17.50%	+3.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.16%	20.39%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	20.39%	+2.50%

KCE vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

KCE vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than GABF's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	1.96%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	1.63%	1.63%	1.56%	1.82%	2.42%	1.53%	2.20%	2.32%	2.67%	1.95%	2.30%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCE and GABF in my portfolio?

KCE and GABF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCE or GABF?

KCE has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to GABF (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, KCE or GABF?

On 3-year performance, KCE leads with 24.32% vs 19.89% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KCE or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, KCE has performed better with a 24.32% return vs 19.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCE or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCE or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.63% for KCE.

What is the main difference between KCE and GABF?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.