PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCCA vs. SOYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCCA vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCCA achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than SOYB's 15.10% return.


KCCA

1D
1.58%
1M
-0.80%
6M
11.36%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
12.78%
3Y*
-6.84%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.86%

SOYB

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.95%
6M
13.13%
YTD
15.10%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
-3.34%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
3.22%
ALL TIME*
0.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$185.98K$257.56K$556.68K
$1.57M$2.15M$2.74M

KCCA vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KCCA
KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF
0.79%-11.81%-16.05%34.07%-17.54%10.75%
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
15.10%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between KCCA and SOYB is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021

0.04

The correlation between KCCA and SOYB shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCCA vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KCCA
KCCA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
KCCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCCA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KCCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCCA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KCCA vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KCCASOYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

2.13

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.45

5.60

-4.15

KCCA vs. SOYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCCA Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the SOYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCCA and SOYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KCCA vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCCA drawdown since its inception was -40.88%, smaller than the maximum SOYB drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCCA and SOYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCCASOYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.88%

-53.76%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.30%

-8.78%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.88%

-30.61%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.54%

-14.16%

-14.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.66%

-25.64%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.82%

3.33%

+5.49%

Volatility

KCCA vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) is 3.56%, while Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that KCCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCCASOYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

5.47%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

10.13%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

13.37%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

17.12%

+6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.73%

16.70%

+7.03%

KCCA vs. SOYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCCA has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SOYB's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCCA vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison

KCCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
KCCA
KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF
2.85%2.87%30.58%3.12%0.24%
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCCA and SOYB have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOYB has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to KCCA (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCCA dropped -40.88% vs SOYB's -53.76%.

On 3-year performance, SOYB leads with -3.34% vs -6.84% for KCCA. On fees, KCCA is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, KCCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SOYB has performed better with a -3.34% return vs -6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KCCA is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.

KCCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.

KCCA is categorized as Commodities, while SOYB is Agricultural Commodities. KCCA tracks S&P Carbon Credit CCA Index, while SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for KCCA and 1.88% for SOYB.

SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCCA and SOYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer