KCAI vs. KOID
KCAI (KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF) and KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCAI is a China Equities fund tracking the Qi China Alpha Index, while KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KCAI returned 54.64% vs 60.99% for KOID. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KOID.
Performance
KCAI vs. KOID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCAI achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 26.82% return.
KCAI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 54.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOID
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 26.82%
- 6M
- 30.26%
- 1Y
- 60.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCAI vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KCAI KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF | 5.79% | 46.18% |
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF | 26.82% | 26.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCAI and KOID is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCAI vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank
KCAI
KOID
KCAI vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF (KCAI) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KCAI | KOID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KCAI | KOID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 2.46 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
KCAI vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCAI drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCAI and KOID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCAI | KOID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -18.19% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -18.19% | +13.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -6.63% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -3.36% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | — | — |
Volatility
KCAI vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCAI | KOID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 24.94% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 24.94% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 24.94% | -3.77% |
KCAI vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCAI vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison
KCAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.48%, more than KOID's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KCAI KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF | 33.48% | 35.42% | 2.19% |
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF | 0.67% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCAI and KOID have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 60.99% vs 54.64% for KCAI. On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 60.99% return vs 54.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KCAI.
KCAI has the higher dividend yield at 33.48%, compared with 0.67% for KOID.
KCAI is categorized as China Equities, while KOID is Technology Equities. KCAI tracks Qi China Alpha Index, while KOID tracks MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KCAI and 0.69% for KOID.
Find the right allocation for KCAI and KOID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer