KCAI vs. ISVBF

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

KCAI (KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF) and ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - KCAI tracks the Qi China Alpha Index while ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KCAI returned 54.64% vs 0.99% for ISVBF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISVBF.

Performance

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF (KCAI) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCAI achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly higher than ISVBF's -9.54% return.

KCAI

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 9.23%
• 1Y: 54.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISVBF

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -7.73%
• YTD: -9.54%
• 6M: -11.86%
• 1Y: 0.99%
• 3Y*: 8.72%
• 5Y*: -5.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KCAI KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF	5.79%	53.29%	11.12%
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	-9.54%	30.64%	16.46%

Correlation

The correlation between KCAI and ISVBF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

KCAI vs. ISVBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCAI

KCAI Risk / Return Rank: 97
KCAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KCAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
KCAI Omega Ratio Rank: 96
KCAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KCAI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

ISVBF

ISVBF Risk / Return Rank: 10
ISVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ISVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ISVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
ISVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
ISVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF (KCAI) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KCAI	ISVBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.12	0.03	+4.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.82	0.26	+5.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.03	+0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.00	0.05	+12.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.98	0.12	+38.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCAI Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is higher than the ISVBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCAI and ISVBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KCAI	ISVBF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12	0.03	+4.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	-0.17	+2.05

Drawdowns

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCAI drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum ISVBF drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCAI and ISVBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCAI	ISVBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.48%	-53.78%	+28.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.23%	-19.18%	+14.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-26.68%	+23.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-32.75%	+25.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	8.35%	-6.94%

Volatility

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF (KCAI) is 4.23%, while iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that KCAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISVBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCAI	ISVBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	10.76%	-6.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	26.64%	-18.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	30.63%	-17.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.17%	30.20%	-9.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	30.20%	-9.03%

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVBF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

KCAI vs. ISVBF - Dividend Comparison

KCAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.48%, while ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KCAI KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF	33.48%	35.42%	2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCAI and ISVBF in my portfolio?

KCAI and ISVBF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCAI or ISVBF?

ISVBF has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to KCAI (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCAI dropped -25.48% vs ISVBF's -53.78%.

Which ETF is better, KCAI or ISVBF?

On 1-year performance, KCAI leads with 54.64% vs 0.99% for ISVBF. On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, KCAI has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KCAI or ISVBF?

Over the 1-year period, KCAI has performed better with a 54.64% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCAI or ISVBF?

ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KCAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCAI or ISVBF?

KCAI has the higher dividend yield at 33.48%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.

What is the main difference between KCAI and ISVBF?

KCAI tracks Qi China Alpha Index, while ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KCAI and 0.40% for ISVBF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KCAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.