PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWP vs. GBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWP vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly higher than GBTC's -29.27% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has underperformed GBTC with an annualized return of 12.39%, while GBTC has yielded a comparatively higher 44.88% annualized return.


KBWP

1D
2.46%
1M
2.63%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-2.38%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
12.39%

GBTC

1D
-3.22%
1M
-17.84%
YTD
-29.27%
6M
-29.42%
1Y
-40.53%
3Y*
36.07%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
44.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWP vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
-1.94%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-29.27%-7.65%113.81%317.61%-75.80%7.03%290.72%106.56%-82.10%1,787.72%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and GBTC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015

0.10

The correlation between KBWP and GBTC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWP vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWP vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWPGBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.86

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

-0.78

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

-1.32

+1.88

KBWP vs. GBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and GBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and GBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWPGBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-89.91%

+50.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-52.45%

+42.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-52.45%

+40.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-85.42%

+68.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-89.91%

+50.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-50.88%

+48.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-43.44%

+39.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

30.79%

-26.43%

Volatility

KBWP vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) is 5.82%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that KBWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWPGBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

13.05%

-7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

34.57%

-22.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

44.21%

-27.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

62.13%

-43.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

81.46%

-60.73%

KBWP vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWP vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%0.00%0.00%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
2.00%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWP and GBTC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBTC has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to KBWP (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs GBTC's -89.91%.

On 10-year performance, GBTC leads with 44.88% vs 12.39% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KBWP has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GBTC has performed better with a 44.88% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.

KBWP is categorized as Financials Equities, while GBTC is Cryptocurrency. KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 1.50% for GBTC.

KBWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWP and GBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer