KBWP vs. FGF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while FGF (Fundamental Global Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, KBWP returned 11.32%/yr vs -37.30%/yr for FGF. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KBWP vs. FGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Fundamental Global Inc. (FGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly higher than FGF's -40.29% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has outperformed FGF with an annualized return of 11.32%, while FGF has yielded a comparatively lower -37.30% annualized return.

KBWP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: -8.05%
• 6M: -4.56%
• 1Y: -6.56%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

FGF

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: 25.54%
• YTD: -40.29%
• 6M: -46.86%
• 1Y: -90.02%
• 3Y*: -66.52%
• 5Y*: -62.19%
• 10Y*: -37.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWP vs. FGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	-8.05%	11.49%	30.45%	7.09%	10.16%	20.61%	-2.05%	28.67%	-2.76%	8.86%
FGF Fundamental Global Inc.	-40.29%	-87.39%	-45.50%	-43.86%	-24.20%	-10.90%	-23.55%	37.31%	-44.55%	-7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and FGF is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2014	0.11

The correlation between KBWP and FGF shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KBWP vs. FGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWP

KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 4
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FGF

FGF Risk / Return Rank: 11
FGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FGF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FGF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWP vs. FGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Fundamental Global Inc. (FGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KBWP	FGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	-0.58	+0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	-1.25	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.85	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	-0.92	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	-1.11	-0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KBWP vs. FGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is comparable to the FGF Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and FGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBWP	FGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	-0.58	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	-0.60	+1.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	-0.45	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	-0.43	+1.12

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. FGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum FGF drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and FGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBWP	FGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-99.66%	+59.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-97.79%	+88.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-98.21%	+85.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.00%	-99.66%	+82.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.76%	-99.66%	+59.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.81%	-99.34%	+90.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-52.44%	+48.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	81.39%	-76.61%

Volatility

KBWP vs. FGF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) is 4.10%, while Fundamental Global Inc. (FGF) has a volatility of 27.13%. This indicates that KBWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBWP	FGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	27.13%	-23.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	67.60%	-56.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	155.43%	-139.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.52%	103.30%	-84.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	83.27%	-62.57%

Dividends

KBWP vs. FGF - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while FGF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGF Fundamental Global Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	2.02%	1.58%	1.64%	1.68%	1.99%	3.02%	1.93%	1.99%	2.11%	1.90%	2.14%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBWP and FGF in my portfolio?

KBWP and FGF have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBWP or FGF?

FGF has higher volatility (27.13%) compared to KBWP (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs FGF's -99.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.