PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWP vs. DFNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWP vs. DFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly lower than DFNL's -4.28% return.


KBWP

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-8.05%
6M
-4.56%
1Y
-6.56%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
11.32%

DFNL

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
0.89%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWP vs. DFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
-8.05%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%10.32%
DFNL
Davis Select Financial ETF
-4.28%28.59%28.56%14.45%-8.45%31.25%-4.97%27.37%-11.59%20.46%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWP and DFNL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWP and DFNL has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWP vs. DFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWP
DFNL

Financial Services

100.0%
92.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWP
100.0%
DFNL
92.6%

Basic Materials

KBWP

-

DFNL

-

Communication Services

KBWP

-

DFNL

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBWP

-

DFNL
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

KBWP

-

DFNL

-

Energy

KBWP

-

DFNL

-

Healthcare

KBWP

-

DFNL

-

Industrials

KBWP

-

DFNL
2.7%

Real Estate

KBWP

-

DFNL

-

Technology

KBWP

-

DFNL
3.7%

Utilities

KBWP

-

DFNL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWP vs. DFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

DFNL
DFNL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWP vs. DFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWPDFNLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.41

1.01

-1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.45

1.46

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.18

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

1.17

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

3.45

-4.64

KBWP vs. DFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWP Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the DFNL Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWP and DFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWPDFNLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

1.01

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.55

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.52

+0.18

Drawdowns

KBWP vs. DFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum DFNL drawdown of -44.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and DFNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWPDFNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-44.51%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-12.94%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-16.05%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-26.27%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.81%

-7.05%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-7.66%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

4.40%

+0.38%

Volatility

KBWP vs. DFNL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) have volatilities of 4.10% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWPDFNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

3.92%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

11.11%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

14.59%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

19.32%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

22.62%

-1.92%

KBWP vs. DFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNL's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWP vs. DFNL - Dividend Comparison

KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than DFNL's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFNL
Davis Select Financial ETF
1.43%1.37%2.19%2.33%3.34%2.45%1.45%2.52%3.12%1.10%0.00%0.00%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
2.02%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWP and DFNL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWP has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to DFNL (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs DFNL's -44.51%.

On 5-year performance, DFNL leads with 10.60% vs 10.19% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFNL has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFNL has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for DFNL.

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.43% for DFNL.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Davis Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.64% for DFNL.

DFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWP and DFNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer