KBWP vs. DFNL
KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) and DFNL (Davis Select Financial ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KBWP is passively managed, while DFNL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KBWP returned 10.19%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for DFNL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBWP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for DFNL.
Performance
KBWP vs. DFNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly lower than DFNL's -4.28% return.
KBWP
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- -6.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
DFNL
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 14.64%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
KBWP vs. DFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | -8.05% | 11.49% | 30.45% | 7.09% | 10.16% | 20.61% | -2.05% | 28.67% | -2.76% | 10.32% |
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | -4.28% | 28.59% | 28.56% | 14.45% | -8.45% | 31.25% | -4.97% | 27.37% | -11.59% | 20.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWP and DFNL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KBWP and DFNL has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
KBWP vs. DFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBWP
DFNL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBWP
DFNL
Basic Materials
KBWP
-
DFNL
-
Communication Services
KBWP
-
DFNL
-
Consumer Cyclical
KBWP
-
DFNL
Consumer Defensive
KBWP
-
DFNL
-
Energy
KBWP
-
DFNL
-
Healthcare
KBWP
-
DFNL
-
Industrials
KBWP
-
DFNL
Real Estate
KBWP
-
DFNL
-
Technology
KBWP
-
DFNL
Utilities
KBWP
-
DFNL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWP vs. DFNL — Risk / Return Rank
KBWP
DFNL
KBWP vs. DFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBWP | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 1.01 | -1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | 1.46 | -1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.17 | -1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 3.45 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBWP | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 1.01 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.52 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
KBWP vs. DFNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum DFNL drawdown of -44.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and DFNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWP | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -44.51% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -12.94% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -16.05% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | -26.27% | +9.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.81% | -7.05% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -7.66% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 4.40% | +0.38% |
Volatility
KBWP vs. DFNL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) have volatilities of 4.10% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWP | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 3.92% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 11.11% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 14.59% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 19.32% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 22.62% | -1.92% |
KBWP vs. DFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBWP vs. DFNL - Dividend Comparison
KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than DFNL's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | 1.43% | 1.37% | 2.19% | 2.33% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 1.45% | 2.52% | 3.12% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 2.02% | 1.58% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWP and DFNL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWP has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to DFNL (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs DFNL's -44.51%.
On 5-year performance, DFNL leads with 10.60% vs 10.19% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFNL has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFNL has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for DFNL.
KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.43% for DFNL.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Davis Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.64% for DFNL.
DFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBWP and DFNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer