PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBFR vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBFR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF (KBFR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KBFR

1D
-1.61%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-5.25%
1M
6.30%
YTD
14.63%
6M
23.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBFR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KBFR and NVDO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBFR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF (KBFR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KBFR vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBFRNVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.08

0.00

Drawdowns

KBFR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.18%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBFR and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBFRNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-16.25%

+12.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-6.14%

+4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-4.97%

+3.76%

Volatility

KBFR vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBFRNVDODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

32.39%

-21.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

32.39%

-21.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

32.39%

-21.44%

KBFR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBFR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

KBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than NVDO's 14.53% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBFR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KBFR.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.53%, compared with 0.11% for KBFR.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KBFR and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBFR and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer