KBE vs. SPCZ
KBE (SPDR S&P Bank ETF) and SPCZ (RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KBE is passively managed, while SPCZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KBE returned 23.62%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for SPCZ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPCZ.
Performance
KBE vs. SPCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBE achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly higher than SPCZ's 1.14% return.
KBE
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
SPCZ
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBE vs. SPCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 5.27% | 12.36% | 23.78% | 5.30% | 3.17% |
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | 1.14% | 10.19% | 5.31% | 5.93% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBE and SPCZ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 0.10 |
KBE vs. SPCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBE
SPCZ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBE
SPCZ
Basic Materials
KBE
-
SPCZ
Communication Services
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Consumer Defensive
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Energy
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Healthcare
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Industrials
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Real Estate
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Technology
KBE
-
SPCZ
Utilities
KBE
-
SPCZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBE vs. SPCZ — Risk / Return Rank
KBE
SPCZ
KBE vs. SPCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBE | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.63 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 0.91 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.33 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 3.20 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBE | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.63 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 1.13 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
KBE vs. SPCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBE drawdown since its inception was -83.15%, which is greater than SPCZ's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBE and SPCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBE | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.15% | -4.47% | -78.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -3.82% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.97% | -4.47% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -1.90% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.54% | -0.51% | -27.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 1.59% | +3.94% |
Volatility
KBE vs. SPCZ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ) at 0.57%. This indicates that KBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBE | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 0.57% | +4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 6.29% | +8.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 7.77% | +13.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.34% | 5.59% | +21.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 5.59% | +24.26% |
KBE vs. SPCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCZ's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBE vs. SPCZ - Dividend Comparison
KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than SPCZ's 11.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.33% | 2.51% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 2.99% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.70% |
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | 11.92% | 12.06% | 4.24% | 5.01% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBE and SPCZ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBE has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to SPCZ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBE dropped -83.15% vs SPCZ's -4.47%.
On 3-year performance, KBE leads with 23.62% vs 6.37% for SPCZ. On fees, KBE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SPCZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KBE has performed better with a 23.62% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPCZ.
SPCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.92%, compared with 2.33% for KBE.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBE and 0.90% for SPCZ.
KBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBE and SPCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer