KBE vs. QABA
KBE (SPDR S&P Bank ETF) and QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) are both Financials Equities funds - KBE tracks the S&P Banks Select Industry Index while QABA tracks the NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBE returned 9.19%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for QABA. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KBE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QABA.
Performance
KBE vs. QABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBE achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than QABA's 8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KBE has outperformed QABA with an annualized return of 9.19%, while QABA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.
KBE
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
QABA
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
KBE vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.87% | 12.36% | 23.78% | 5.30% | -14.83% | 33.46% | -8.75% | 29.78% | -19.65% | 10.49% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 8.16% | 4.62% | 14.49% | -2.18% | -9.01% | 34.20% | -10.70% | 22.85% | -16.47% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBE and QABA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009 | 0.92 |
The correlation between KBE and QABA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
KBE vs. QABA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBE
QABA
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBE
QABA
Basic Materials
KBE
-
QABA
-
Communication Services
KBE
-
QABA
-
Consumer Cyclical
KBE
-
QABA
-
Consumer Defensive
KBE
-
QABA
-
Energy
KBE
-
QABA
-
Healthcare
KBE
-
QABA
-
Industrials
KBE
-
QABA
Real Estate
KBE
-
QABA
-
Technology
KBE
-
QABA
-
Utilities
KBE
-
QABA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBE vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank
KBE
QABA
KBE vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBE | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | 3.69 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBE | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.12 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.24 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.34 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
KBE vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBE drawdown since its inception was -83.15%, which is greater than QABA's maximum drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBE and QABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBE | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.15% | -49.30% | -33.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -12.49% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.97% | -25.82% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.25% | -42.93% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.14% | -49.30% | -3.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -4.25% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.54% | -11.43% | -16.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 5.02% | +0.53% |
Volatility
KBE vs. QABA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBE | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 5.63% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 15.22% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 22.50% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.36% | 26.50% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 28.69% | +1.16% |
KBE vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QABA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBE vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison
KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, which matches QABA's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.39% | 2.51% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 2.99% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.70% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.40% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, KBE and QABA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KBE has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to QABA (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBE dropped -83.15% vs QABA's -49.30%.
On 10-year performance, KBE leads with 9.19% vs 6.80% for QABA. On fees, KBE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KBE has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.
KBE and QABA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.39%.
KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index, while QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBE and 0.60% for QABA.
KBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBE and QABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer