PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBE vs. QABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBE vs. QABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBE achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than QABA's 8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KBE has outperformed QABA with an annualized return of 9.19%, while QABA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.


KBE

1D
-2.28%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
2.87%
6M
4.27%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
9.19%

QABA

1D
-2.39%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
8.16%
6M
7.37%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
6.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBE vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.87%12.36%23.78%5.30%-14.83%33.46%-8.75%29.78%-19.65%10.49%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
8.16%4.62%14.49%-2.18%-9.01%34.20%-10.70%22.85%-16.47%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KBE and QABA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.92

The correlation between KBE and QABA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

KBE vs. QABA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBE
QABA

Financial Services

100.0%
99.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBE
100.0%
QABA
99.7%

Basic Materials

KBE

-

QABA

-

Communication Services

KBE

-

QABA

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBE

-

QABA

-

Consumer Defensive

KBE

-

QABA

-

Energy

KBE

-

QABA

-

Healthcare

KBE

-

QABA

-

Industrials

KBE

-

QABA
0.3%

Real Estate

KBE

-

QABA

-

Technology

KBE

-

QABA

-

Utilities

KBE

-

QABA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBE vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBE
KBE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QABA
QABA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBE vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBEQABADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.83

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.49

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.39

3.69

-0.30

KBE vs. QABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the QABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBE and QABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBEQABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.83

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.12

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.24

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.34

-0.24

Drawdowns

KBE vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBE drawdown since its inception was -83.15%, which is greater than QABA's maximum drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBE and QABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBEQABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.15%

-49.30%

-33.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-12.49%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.97%

-25.82%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.25%

-42.93%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.14%

-49.30%

-3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-4.25%

-3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.54%

-11.43%

-16.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

5.02%

+0.53%

Volatility

KBE vs. QABA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBEQABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

5.63%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

15.22%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

22.50%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

26.50%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.85%

28.69%

+1.16%

KBE vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QABA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBE vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison

KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, which matches QABA's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.39%2.51%2.35%2.78%2.99%2.16%2.44%2.33%2.18%1.36%1.39%1.70%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
2.40%2.52%2.37%2.71%2.10%1.68%2.55%1.95%1.90%1.42%1.13%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, KBE and QABA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KBE has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to QABA (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBE dropped -83.15% vs QABA's -49.30%.

On 10-year performance, KBE leads with 9.19% vs 6.80% for QABA. On fees, KBE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBE has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.

KBE and QABA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.39%.

KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index, while QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBE and 0.60% for QABA.

KBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBE and QABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer