KBDU vs. KOID
KBDU (KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBDU is a China Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index. KBDU is actively managed, while KOID is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBDU charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KOID.
Performance
KBDU vs. KOID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBDU achieves a -39.04% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 17.44% return.
KBDU
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -52.02%
- YTD
- -39.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOID
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 1Y
- 40.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBDU vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | -39.04% | 19.79% |
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF | 17.44% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBDU and KOID is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBDU vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank
KBDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KOID
KBDU vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBDU | KOID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBDU vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBDU drawdown since its inception was -64.77%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBDU and KOID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBDU | KOID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.77% | -18.19% | -46.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.22% | -13.55% | -45.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -3.70% | -30.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility
KBDU vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBDU | KOID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.68% | 27.66% | +75.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.68% | 26.98% | +75.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.68% | 26.98% | +75.70% |
KBDU vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBDU has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBDU vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison
KBDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBDU and KOID have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KBDU.
KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for KBDU.
KBDU is categorized as China Equities, while KOID is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KBDU and 0.69% for KOID.
Find the right allocation for KBDU and KOID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer