PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBDU vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBDU vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBDU achieves a -11.68% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -55.22% return.


KBDU

1D
-5.85%
1M
3.94%
YTD
-11.68%
6M
6.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
-10.50%
1M
1.49%
YTD
-55.22%
6M
-45.71%
1Y
-59.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBDU vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KBDU
KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF
-11.68%34.59%
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
-55.22%35.31%

Correlation

The correlation between KBDU and CRMG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBDU vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBDU

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBDU vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KBDU vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBDUCRMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

-0.64

+1.03

Drawdowns

KBDU vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBDU drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBDU and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBDUCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.14%

-74.38%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.93%

-67.23%

+26.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.72%

-37.71%

+8.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.88%

Volatility

KBDU vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBDUCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.15%

75.33%

+26.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.15%

75.73%

+26.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.15%

75.73%

+26.42%

KBDU vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBDU has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBDU vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither KBDU nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KBDU and CRMG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KBDU.

KBDU and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KBDU and 0.75% for CRMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBDU and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer