PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAUG vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KAUG vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAUG achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.


KAUG

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.65%
6M
5.99%
YTD
8.10%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.71%
6M
17.92%
YTD
18.52%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAUG vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KAUG
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF
8.10%5.52%3.21%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
18.52%-12.98%-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between KAUG and RSBY is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAUG vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAUG
KAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
KAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAUG vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KAUGRSBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.15

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

5.04

+7.64

KAUG vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAUG and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KAUG vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.66%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAUG and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KAUGRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.66%

-23.32%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

-7.95%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-6.45%

+6.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-13.35%

+10.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

3.39%

-2.31%

Volatility

KAUG vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) is 0.82%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that KAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KAUGRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

3.15%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

8.37%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.86%

11.41%

-3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

13.37%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.02%

13.37%

-2.35%

KAUG vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

KAUG vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

KAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.


PositionTTM20252024
KAUG
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
1.75%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


KAUG and RSBY have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSBY has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to KAUG (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KAUG dropped -15.66% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs 14.35% for KAUG. On fees, KAUG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KAUG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for KAUG.

KAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KAUG and 0.98% for RSBY.

KAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KAUG and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer