KAUG vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KAUG (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KAUG is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. KAUG is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past year, KAUG returned 16.01% vs 56.95% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. KAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

KAUG vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAUG achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.09% return.

KAUG

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 61.09%
• 6M: 56.40%
• 1Y: 56.95%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: 17.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAUG vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KAUG Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF	7.32%	5.52%	2.80%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	61.09%	-11.86%	-2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between KAUG and OILK is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	-0.03

The correlation between KAUG and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KAUG vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAUG

KAUG Risk / Return Rank: 70
KAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
KAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
KAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
KAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAUG vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KAUG	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.99	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	2.51	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.33	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	3.30	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.77	6.67	+8.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KAUG vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAUG and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KAUG	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	1.99	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.11	+0.66

Drawdowns

KAUG vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.66%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAUG and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	KAUG	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.66%	-83.76%	+68.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.94%	-17.35%	+13.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.49%	+5.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-32.60%	+29.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	8.57%	-7.48%

Volatility

KAUG vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) is 0.95%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that KAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KAUG	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	10.52%	-9.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.15%	23.32%	-18.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.01%	28.82%	-20.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.20%	30.13%	-18.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.20%	35.97%	-24.77%

KAUG vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

KAUG vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

KAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KAUG Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.34%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KAUG and OILK in my portfolio?

KAUG and OILK have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KAUG or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to KAUG (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KAUG dropped -15.66% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, KAUG or OILK?

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 56.95% vs 16.01% for KAUG. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, KAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KAUG or OILK?

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 56.95% return vs 16.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KAUG or OILK?

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KAUG or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.00% for KAUG.

What is the main difference between KAUG and OILK?

KAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KAUG and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.