PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAUG vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KAUG vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAUG achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's 5.43% return.


KAUG

1D
0.10%
1M
0.56%
6M
6.47%
YTD
8.59%
1Y
17.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.49%

PJUL

1D
0.35%
1M
0.51%
6M
4.62%
YTD
5.43%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$320.24K$293.83K$502.19K
$6.04M$11.74M$6.93M

KAUG vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KAUG and PJUL is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.74

The correlation between KAUG and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAUG vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KAUG
KAUG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
KAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KAUG vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KAUGPJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.41

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

2.87

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.09

15.66

+1.43

KAUG vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAUG and PJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KAUG vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.66%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAUG and PJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KAUGPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.66%

-18.17%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

-3.64%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-1.45%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.67%

+0.30%

Volatility

KAUG vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) is 0.28%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) has a volatility of 1.96%. This indicates that KAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KAUGPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

1.96%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.77%

4.13%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.53%

5.21%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

8.62%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.85%

9.96%

+0.89%

KAUG vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KAUG and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

KAUG vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither KAUG nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
KAUG
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


KAUG and PJUL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJUL has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to KAUG (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KAUG dropped -15.66% vs PJUL's -18.17%.

On 1-year performance, KAUG leads with 17.74% vs 11.10% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KAUG has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KAUG and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

KAUG and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

KAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KAUG and PJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer