PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAUFX vs. FGSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd (KAUFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAUFX achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly higher than FGSAX's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, KAUFX has underperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.


KAUFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.50%
YTD
5.87%
6M
5.95%
1Y
13.25%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
11.51%

FGSAX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.76%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.62%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KAUFX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd
5.87%12.18%29.84%14.88%-30.30%2.46%28.54%32.56%4.03%27.65%
FGSAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund
1.66%10.54%32.97%27.05%-24.60%22.39%35.50%27.95%-3.23%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between KAUFX and FGSAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 1986

0.81

The correlation between KAUFX and FGSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAUFX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAUFX
KAUFX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KAUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KAUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FGSAX
FGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd (KAUFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KAUFXFGSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.40

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

1.11

+2.39

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAUFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the FGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAUFX and FGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KAUFXFGSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.32

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.49

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.68

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.48

+0.10

Drawdowns

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAUFX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAUFX and FGSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KAUFXFGSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.66%

-66.17%

+11.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.83%

-13.73%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-24.51%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.76%

-35.79%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-37.19%

-3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.06%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-16.15%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

4.90%

-1.11%

Volatility

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd (KAUFX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) at 3.54%. This indicates that KAUFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KAUFXFGSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.54%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

13.72%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

16.85%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

22.41%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

22.32%

-1.49%

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAUFX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

KAUFX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison

KAUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than FGSAX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGSAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.84%4.92%4.32%0.00%2.31%25.75%7.07%8.13%14.46%13.93%0.89%25.34%
KAUFX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Fd
10.17%10.76%22.39%1.89%0.00%9.77%6.94%11.75%15.74%11.76%10.48%16.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


KAUFX and FGSAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KAUFX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to FGSAX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KAUFX dropped -54.66% vs FGSAX's -66.17%.

KAUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KAUFX and FGSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer