PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAT vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KAT vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.29% return.


KAT

1D
1.14%
1M
2.91%
6M
2.43%
YTD
3.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

YCS

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.27%
6M
9.33%
YTD
7.29%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
23.55%
10Y*
13.76%
ALL TIME*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$571.01K$654.17K$709.38K
$1.53M$2.43M$1.42M

KAT vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KAT
Scharf ETF
3.63%0.85%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.29%16.80%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and YCS is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAT vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KAT vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KATYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

KAT vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KAT vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KATYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-49.56%

+40.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-5.68%

+3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-19.75%

+16.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

Volatility

KAT vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KATYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

16.85%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

21.16%

-10.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.48%

18.61%

-8.13%

KAT vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

KAT vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

KAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.08%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KAT and YCS have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

KAT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

KAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 1.00% for YCS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KAT and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer