KAT vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KAT (Scharf ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Scharf Investments, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. KAT is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

KAT vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.

KAT

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAT vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KAT Scharf ETF	0.37%	0.98%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and OILK is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025	-0.14

KAT vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KAT	OILK
Financial Services	26.2%	-
Healthcare	22.9%	-
Industrials	14.4%	-
Technology	12.5%	-
Communication Services	6.3%	-
Energy	6.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	4.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KAT vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAT vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KAT	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.12	+0.05

Drawdowns

KAT vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	KAT	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-83.76%	+74.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.35%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.98%	-3.66%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-32.61%	+29.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KAT	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.48%	28.75%	-18.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	30.12%	-19.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.48%	35.97%	-25.49%

KAT vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

KAT vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KAT Scharf ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KAT and OILK in my portfolio?

KAT and OILK have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KAT or OILK?

On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KAT or OILK?

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KAT or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.

What is the main difference between KAT and OILK?

KAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.68% for OILK.