KAT vs. EQL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KAT (Scharf ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. KAT is actively managed, while EQL is passively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.

Performance

KAT vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than EQL's 10.71% return.

KAT

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EQL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 13.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	$3.33M	$2.84M	$2.70M
KAT Scharf ETF	$571.01K	$654.17K	$709.38K

KAT vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KAT Scharf ETF	3.63%	0.85%
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	10.71%	3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and EQL is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.74

KAT vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KAT	EQL
Financial Services	27.0%	9.1%
Healthcare	23.1%	9.4%
Industrials	15.1%	9.3%
Technology	13.2%	10.2%
Communication Services	6.1%	8.9%
Energy	5.7%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	9.6%
Basic Materials	3.0%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	8.8%
Real Estate	-	8.7%
Utilities	-	9.4%

Return for Risk

KAT vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 79
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KAT vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KAT	EQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.89	—

Drawdowns

KAT vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and EQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	KAT	EQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-35.65%	+26.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-0.27%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-3.23%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KAT	EQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.48%	9.50%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	14.51%	-4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.48%	16.49%	-6.01%

KAT vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

KAT vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

KAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than EQL's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.35%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%
KAT Scharf ETF	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KAT and EQL in my portfolio?

KAT and EQL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KAT or EQL?

On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KAT or EQL?

EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KAT or EQL?

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.08% for KAT.

What is the main difference between KAT and EQL?

They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.27% for EQL.