KAT vs. AFOS
KAT (Scharf ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
KAT vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 30.38% return.
KAT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 30.38%
- 6M
- 28.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAT vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | -2.12% | 0.85% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 30.38% | 24.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAT and AFOS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAT vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KAT vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAT | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -11.52% | +2.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.33% | -4.68% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -1.43% | -1.94% |
Volatility
KAT vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAT | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 21.51% | -10.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 21.51% | -10.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 21.51% | -10.93% |
KAT vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAT vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% |
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KAT and AFOS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.
They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for KAT and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer