PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAT vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KAT vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.24% return.


KAT

1D
0.70%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.07%
6M
2.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
0.15%
1M
7.26%
YTD
32.24%
6M
36.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAT vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KAT
Scharf ETF
1.07%0.98%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
32.24%24.53%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and AFOS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAT vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KAT vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KATAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

4.35

-4.09

Drawdowns

KAT vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KATAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-11.52%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-0.14%

-4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-1.37%

-1.84%

Volatility

KAT vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KATAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

20.14%

-9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

20.14%

-9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.48%

20.14%

-9.66%

KAT vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

KAT vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


PositionTTM2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KAT and AFOS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.

They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KAT and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer