KAPR vs. NVDO
KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. KAPR is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
KAPR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAPR achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 21.85% return.
KAPR
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 32.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAPR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.96% | 4.92% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 21.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAPR and NVDO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAPR vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
KAPR
NVDO
KAPR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.53 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.56 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.12 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.45 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
KAPR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAPR and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -16.25% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.23% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -5.00% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | — | — |
Volatility
KAPR vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.54% | 31.88% | -25.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 31.88% | -20.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.63% | 31.88% | -20.25% |
KAPR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAPR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
KAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.67% | 16.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KAPR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 0.00% for KAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KAPR and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for KAPR and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer