K vs. QQQY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

K (Kellogg Company) is a stock, while QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

K vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

K

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 7.95%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 18.67%
• 1Y: 35.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
K Kellogg Company	0.00%	5.99%	49.75%	7.08%
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	18.85%	14.96%	7.70%	7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between K and QQQY is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.03

Return for Risk

K vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY

QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 75
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	K	QQQY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.25	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	K	QQQY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.55%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.91%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	K	QQQY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.66%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	14.74%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	14.74%	—

Dividends

K vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

K's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than QQQY's 35.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
K Kellogg Company	1.39%	2.76%	2.79%	10.56%	3.28%	3.59%	3.66%	3.27%	3.86%	3.12%	2.77%	2.74%
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	35.18%	45.34%	83.34%	20.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both K and QQQY in my portfolio?

K and QQQY have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.