PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K vs. PNNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PNNT

1D
1.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
-29.84%
6M
-27.65%
1Y
-33.82%
3Y*
0.38%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
7.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
-29.84%-2.96%16.56%37.25%-8.90%61.71%-17.99%14.30%2.05%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between K and PNNT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.20

The correlation between K and PNNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

K:

$3.65

PNNT:

$302.41

PE Ratio

K:

22.87

PNNT:

0.01

PEG Ratio

K:

3.84

PNNT:

0.00

PS Ratio

K:

2.30

PNNT:

2.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

K:

$12.67B

PNNT:

$85.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

K:

$4.41B

PNNT:

$24.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

K:

$2.25B

PNNT:

$16.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PNNT
PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KPNNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

K vs. PNNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

K vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KPNNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.58%

Volatility

K vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KPNNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.76%

Dividends

K vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison

K has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
24.94%16.11%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%

Financials

K vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.26B
27.25M
(K) Total Revenue
(PNNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


K and PNNT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K and PNNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer